Neighbor who lived one floor below Alex Pretti makes heartbreaking claim after he was shot dead by ICE agents

The Fatal Encounter – What Witnesses Are Saying
Scene and Sequence of Events

Based on verified footage, eyewitness accounts, and reporting, the sequence leading up to Pretti’s death is more complex and disputed than federal statements suggest:

Federal immigration agents were conducting enforcement activities on Nicollet Avenue on the Saturday morning in question.

Multiple witnesses captured video showing agents pushing and pepper-spraying protesters or observers, including at least one woman who had been knocked to the ground.

Pretti, seen holding a cell phone, reportedly moved to shield or help that woman as agents approached, rather than advancing toward officers in an aggressive or threatening way.

In the videos and witness descriptions, agents moved in and forcefully restrained Pretti. Some footage appears to show an agent remove a firearm from his person before at least 10 shots were fired over several seconds while Pretti was on or near the ground.

Multiple witnesses say Pretti never brandished a weapon toward agents and that they saw no threatening behavior. One eyewitness told reporters: “He wasn’t even turned toward them. It didn’t look like he was trying to resist, just trying to help the woman up…”

A doctor who attempted to aid Pretti after the shooting later said agents initially blocked medical help and focused instead on counting wounds, deepening outrage and concern about how federal personnel treated the aftermath.

Neighbor’s “Heartbreaking Claim” and Personal Recollections

As suggested in your prompt, neighbors have come forward with personal reflections that underscore the stark contrast between Pretti’s public reputation and how the incident has been portrayed by some authorities.

One neighbor — identified only by first name in early reports — lived one floor below Pretti in their condominium building and offered a description heavy with affection and disbelief:

She described Pretti as quiet, warm-hearted, and always willing to help — someone who didn’t just live in the community but actively cared about it.

She said she never associated him with going out with a gun and was surprised by official claims that he approached federal agents armed.

Her comments echoed broader accounts from people who knew Pretti as a caregiver, friend, and neighbor — not someone inclined toward violence.

These kinds of neighbor statements have become part of a growing public narrative — especially on social media and at vigils — which frames Pretti not as a potential threat, but as a civilian who died while attempting to protect another person.

Family Response — “Heartbroken but Very Angry”

Pretti’s parents, Michael and Susan Pretti, released a powerful statement after learning of their son’s death. They described themselves as both heartbroken and outraged by how federal officials characterized the shooting:

“The sickening lies told about our son by the administration are reprehensible and disgusting… He was clearly not holding a gun… He was holding his phone and trying to protect a woman.”

Family representatives also criticized the slow, opaque communication from federal agencies and law enforcement in the hours after the incident, saying they first learned of their son’s death from a reporter rather than from authorities.

In a widely shared fundraising campaign, supporters raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Pretti’s family in the immediate aftermath — a testament to the community’s grief and solidarity.

Official Statements and Government Reactions

Federal officials, including DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol commanders, stood by the initial narrative that Pretti posed a threat — claiming he had a handgun and resisted, justifying the use of lethal force. President Donald Trump also publicly defended the agents and emphasized the presence of immigration enforcement personnel in Minneapolis.

Minnesota officials responded sharply:

Governor Tim Walz called for the immediate withdrawal of federal agents, describing them as untrained and exacerbating violence.

Local police acknowledged video evidence exists, with a top Minneapolis law enforcement official saying the footage “speaks for itself.”

Elected leaders nationwide and labor unions, including the AFL-CIO, condemned the use of force and demanded transparent investigations.

Public Response and Protests

The shooting prompted broad public outcry and protest actions:

Hundreds gathered in Minneapolis immediately after the incident, clashing at times with law enforcement and demanding accountability and justice.

Vigils and demonstrations also took place in cities across the Midwest, including Wisconsin, as communities expressed grief and solidarity.

Residents turned the site of Pretti’s death into a memorial of candles and flowers, while chants and signs called for justice and introspection on federal immigration enforcement strategies.

Supporters have framed Pretti not only as a victim of excessive force but as someone who embodied civic kindness and bravery in his final moments — an interpretation supported widely in witness and neighbor accounts.

Legal and Broader Policy Context
Legal Scrutiny

Civil rights groups, including the ACLU, are expected to play roles in demanding accountability and pushing for legal scrutiny of federal action. Past shootings by federal agents in Minneapolis have already sparked court challenges to immigration enforcement tactics and calls for external investigations.

Legal observers note that prosecuting federal officers is historically rare and hinges on subjective “reasonable perception” standards. Nonetheless, the volume of video evidence and public pressure may influence ongoing discussions about oversight and accountability.

Operation Metro Surge and Minneapolis Tensions

The Pretti shooting occurred against the backdrop of Operation Metro Surge, a broadened federal immigration enforcement effort deploying thousands of agents into Minnesota. This initiative has been highly controversial:

Local leaders argue it represents an overreach of federal power and puts residents — including U.S. citizens — at risk.

Critics warn that the surge has created a climate of fear, especially in immigrant and activist communities, and have linked enforcement tactics to excessive force incidents.

Human Impact — Remembering Alex Pretti

Beyond politics and policy, the human impact of Pretti’s death is profound:

Family and friends describe him as a devoted nurse who cared deeply for veterans and community members alike.

Neighbors speak of his helpfulness and warmth; many struggle to reconcile official accounts with their personal memories of his character.

Vigils and grassroots memorials continue to draw mourners who emphasize compassion, justice, and solidarity in place of division.

Conclusion — A Complex and Contested Story

The killing of Alex Pretti has become a flashpoint in national debates over immigration enforcement, civil liberties, the use of federal force in domestic contexts, and community safety. The story highlights:

Sharp conflicts between official federal accounts and eyewitness evidence.

Deep pain expressed by family, neighbors and the broader civic community.

Ongoing disputes over accountability for federal agents and the future of enforcement operations in communities like Minneapolis.

As investigations continue — with legal challenges, video evidence analysis, and public pressure mounting — the narrative of how and why Pretti was shot will remain contested. For now, millions are left grappling with a tragic and deeply human loss that has ignited intense debate about law enforcement, power, and the meaning of justice in America.

Leave a Comment