J.D. Vance and Usha Vance Announce Fourth Child — And the Internet Erupts
Vice President J.D. Vance and his wife, Usha Vance, announced on January 20, 2026, that they are expecting their fourth child, due in late July. The couple shared the news on social media, with the announcement widely covered in the U.S. press because it marks the first time a sitting vice president’s spouse has given birth while in office.
In a joint Instagram post, the Vances said they were “very excited” to welcome a baby boy to their family, which already includes children Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel.
Far-Right and Racist Attacks Target Usha Vance
One of the most disturbing elements of the backlash has been the overt racism directed at Usha Vance, who is of Indian descent and grew up in a Hindu family. Online trolls — including some on far-right message boards and social media platforms — resurfaced years-old racist tropes about interracial families and used the pregnancy announcement to attack her identity and background.
In mid-2024, during Vance’s run for national office, posts began circulating alleging that Usha Vance and the couple’s children were being unfairly targeted because of their Indian heritage. Some far-right social media users criticized Vance for marrying a non-white woman and caring for children who do not fit certain extremist narratives of racial purity.
These attacks didn’t disappear with time. As soon as the baby news broke, users on alternative and extremist forums brought up old racist content and tied it to the Vances’ growing family. The intensity of some posts was such that mainstream moderation teams had to intervene to remove hate speech and violent language.
Sexist and Misogynistic Abuse
Alongside racist attacks, many of the online responses leaned into sexist and misogynistic narratives. Critics on social media described Usha Vance in demeaning terms, suggesting she had no agency in her family planning or that she was somehow “forced” into further pregnancies by her husband’s political ambitions.
One viral Reddit thread joked crudely about the announcement with offensive language and insults toward Usha, reflecting a toxic segment of internet culture that weaponizes motherhood announcements against women in the public eye.
The abuse wasn’t limited to crude insults; some commenters implied that Usha’s worth was tied to her reproductive role, while others made degrading suggestions about her autonomy and personal life. This type of commentary is unfortunately common in online trolling campaigns against public women, especially those affiliated with contentious political figures.
Political Spats and Rumor Mills
The backlash wasn’t only personal — it was also deeply political.
Wild Theories and Viral Memes
Immediately following the announcement, some social media users took to memes and speculation, spinning unrelated controversies into the narrative. For example, after a meme about Vance’s Halloween costume circulated, several internet sleuths humorously (and falsely) theorized about the conception timing of the baby, leading to widespread jokes about the pregnancy’s origins.
Political Crossfire
Beyond internet forums, some mainstream politicians and commentators used the announcement to stoke partisan conflict. A Democratic politician reportedly made a controversial remark referring to the baby as “another brown child her husband’s movement wants to deport,” invoking immigration policy tensions and criticisms of Vance’s political stance.
This type of political positioning turned what might have been a straightforward personal story into fodder for broader ideological battles, feeding both sides’ narratives and intensifying online commentary.
Misinformation and Deepfake Attacks
Perhaps the most alarming aspects of the backlash were the misinformation campaigns and deepfake content circulated online.
In 2025, an AI-generated video showing “Usha Vance” falsely stating she regretted her marriage spread widely on platforms like Instagram and Threads. Experts who examined the video confirmed it was a deepfake, pointing to glitches and unnatural facial movement as evidence of manipulation.
Deepfakes like this aren’t just crude jokes — they are designed to damage reputations by fabricating statements the person never made. In Usha’s case, the fake video suggested profound marital unhappiness and disparagingly framed her relationship with Vance, but fact-checkers found no evidence she ever said these things.
Religious Backlash and Mischaracterizations
Another thread of controversy stemmed from discussions about Usha Vance’s religion.
In 2025, Vance made public remarks expressing a hope that Usha might one day embrace his Christian faith — a comment intended to reflect a personal hope rooted in his beliefs. However, many critics labeled the comment as insensitive or even “Hindu-phobic,” accusing him of disregarding his wife’s identity for political gain.
Continue reading…
